[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: Paul Vickers
Remote Name: 22.214.171.124
I picked SSADM as an example to get the discussion flowing.
The last post picked up on many methods not assisting with what is really HARD (i.e. difficult) to do, specifically the analysis and coding. Leaving the coding question aside, what things do the rest of the CD3005 group think might make the analysis difficult? One could say that it is the soft issues that are hard (difficult) and the hard issues that are reasonable straightforward.
Comments and thoughts on this subject please.