[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
Remote Name: 220.127.116.11
This raises some interesting questions.
For example, how small does a project/organisation have to be before it is decided that a methodology would be counter-productive?
Moreover, what does the conclusion tell us about the nature of methodologies in general?
Perhaps the true value of methodologies is that they provide a means to marshall resources on a large scale, rather than providing a means of ensuring quality of any kind. In this way, they might be considered a necessary evil when logistics prevent the use of a more intuituve approach - an intrinsically bureaucratic concept.
On the other hand, organisations forced to forget about methodologies may experience this as an actual loss - 'If only we had the time and money to use JSD/SSADM etc..'.
Is there any evidence that this last scenario occurs? Should it occur?