|
‘It is more at the contemplative level of reception, of listening or
of impregnation than of the looking-for in a predetermined way. It
seems to arise from a modality which is more passive than cognition,
even if we are well aware that that relative passivity is woven into
the background by our categorical filters, whose permanent activity
is hard to suspend. In
this sense, our description of the reflective act is not about
forcing a passive, mechanical reflection. The mirror which
represents the person who operates the reflectivity is anything but
than neutral. What is in play is to give oneself the possibility of
not immediately in-forming reality by a form of thought through a
language which is already available, thereby establishing a relative
and provisional zone of silence from which to set off with a new
relation to the reality of the lived.’
The Gesture of
Awareness. An account of its structural dynamics
ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
Natalie Depraz, Francisco J. Varela, Pierre Vermersch
M.Velmans (Ed.),Investigating
Phenomenal Consciousness.
Benjamin
Publishers, Amsterdam, 1999
Claus Otto Scharmer (2000): Presencing: Learning From the Future As
It Emerges,
MIT Sloan School of Management, OSG, October 20th,
2000
|